Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments in Steele County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 270
Recipients of Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments from farms in Steele County, North Dakota totaled $8,105,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Kurtis Dean Boe | Hatton, ND 58240 | $19,361 |
122 | Keith Lynn Palmer | Sharon, ND 58277 | $19,296 |
123 | John David Motter | Hope, ND 58046 | $19,044 |
124 | Daniel Opie Motter | Clifford, ND 58016 | $19,044 |
125 | Lauren Arly Erickson | Portland, ND 58274 | $18,828 |
126 | Kerry Lynn Baldwin | Hope, ND 58046 | $18,434 |
127 | Christa N Strand | Portland, ND 58274 | $18,246 |
128 | Highland Partnership | Aneta, ND 58212 | $17,907 |
129 | Highland Company Inc | Aneta, ND 58212 | $17,907 |
130 | Trevor Jay Wigen | Finley, ND 58230 | $17,575 |
131 | Matthew Ray Klath | Portland, ND 58274 | $17,112 |
132 | Glenn Marvin Jacobson | Finley, ND 58230 | $17,047 |
133 | Mark Kloster Farms Inc | Mayville, ND 58257 | $16,828 |
134 | Braeden Earl Regner | Arthur, ND 58006 | $16,584 |
135 | Vincent Joseph Kubischta | Hope, ND 58046 | $16,529 |
136 | Jesse Gerald Bye | Hatton, ND 58240 | $16,488 |
137 | Renae Rayner | Finley, ND 58230 | $15,752 |
138 | Curtis J Klath | Mayville, ND 58257 | $15,610 |
139 | Kristopher William Satrom | Page, ND 58064 | $14,839 |
140 | Kayla Marie Satrom | Page, ND 58064 | $14,839 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”