Total Commodity Programs in Steele County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 1,339
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Steele County, North Dakota totaled $188,377,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Wayne & Pamela Amundson J V | Hope, ND 58046 | $467,063 |
142 | Mark Allan Jacobsen | Luverne, ND 58056 | $466,446 |
143 | Lesley John Oxton | Hope, ND 58046 | $462,900 |
144 | Darren Scott Meyer | Hope, ND 58046 | $462,823 |
145 | Gerald Arnold Bye | Hatton, ND 58240 | $461,689 |
146 | Bruce Cameron Gangelhoff | Finley, ND 58230 | $459,634 |
147 | Steven Ardell Enger | Hatton, ND 58240 | $459,434 |
148 | Joshua James Ihry | Hope, ND 58046 | $448,830 |
149 | Keith Ellsworth Johnson | Sharon, ND 58277 | $448,621 |
150 | Mark Warren Johnson | Valley City, ND 58072 | $447,698 |
151 | Richard Hartvig Fugleberg | Portland, ND 58274 | $444,405 |
152 | Gregory Scott Thykeson | Portland, ND 58274 | $441,724 |
153 | First United Bank ** | Park River, ND 58270 | $440,263 |
154 | Jeffrey Roger Anderson | Sharon, ND 58277 | $438,702 |
155 | Joshua Dean Ostenson | Finley, ND 58230 | $437,188 |
156 | Marlow Clayton Rygg | Portland, ND 58274 | $436,759 |
157 | Matthew James Powell | Hope, ND 58046 | $436,599 |
158 | David Camer Washburn | Hope, ND 58046 | $430,364 |
159 | James Duane Ness | Hatton, ND 58240 | $429,232 |
160 | Peter Lyle Ness | Sharon, ND 58277 | $425,482 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”