Farm Subsidy information
Steele County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Steele County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 562
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Steele County, North Dakota totaled $31,732,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Jerry Neil Hashbarger | Hope, ND 58046 | $32,767 |
162 | Paul Kendal Hanson | Portland, ND 58274 | $32,404 |
163 | Jeffrey Scott Jacobson | Finley, ND 58230 | $32,366 |
164 | James Clayton Ihry | Hope, ND 58046 | $32,062 |
165 | David A Archer | Finley, ND 58230 | $31,725 |
166 | Charles Allen Phelps | Sharon, ND 58277 | $31,538 |
167 | Olson-kloster Farm Partnership Lllp | Colorado Springs, CO 80919 | $31,320 |
168 | David Loran Severson | Hope, ND 58046 | $30,830 |
169 | Bobby Harold Lee | Sharon, ND 58277 | $30,482 |
170 | Jack Francis Vadnie | Clifford, ND 58016 | $30,430 |
171 | Benjamin Abel Vig | Sharon, ND 58277 | $29,871 |
172 | Paul Lynn Elston | Hope, ND 58046 | $29,797 |
173 | Timothy S Ness | Hatton, ND 58240 | $29,648 |
174 | Brent Jason Lyste | Finley, ND 58230 | $29,319 |
175 | Russell Huschka | Hope, ND 58046 | $29,282 |
176 | Dean Arthur Vig | Aneta, ND 58212 | $29,115 |
177 | Mylo Erickson | West Fargo, ND 58078 | $28,841 |
178 | Lucietta Anna Hashbarger | Fargo, ND 58103 | $28,744 |
179 | Keith Howard Rindy | Portland, ND 58274 | $28,493 |
180 | Highland Partnership | Aneta, ND 58212 | $28,259 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”