Farm Subsidy information
Steele County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Steele County, North Dakota, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 554
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Steele County, North Dakota totaled $31,382,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gary Conrad Nelson | Luverne, ND 58056 | $168,895 |
22 | Peggy Sue Ihry | Hope, ND 58046 | $168,652 |
23 | Kelly Johan Jacobson | Finley, ND 58230 | $168,216 |
24 | Shannon Lee Bergstrom | Hope, ND 58046 | $168,126 |
25 | Tor Franklin Bergstrom | Hope, ND 58046 | $168,126 |
26 | Don Eugene Goughnour | Finley, ND 58230 | $166,774 |
27 | John Joseph Ihry | Hope, ND 58046 | $166,757 |
28 | Wayne & Dori Amundson Farms | Hope, ND 58046 | $165,237 |
29 | Perry James Ostmo | Sharon, ND 58277 | $157,333 |
30 | J & S Boe Farms Inc | Hatton, ND 58240 | $154,253 |
31 | Gregory Scott Thykeson | Portland, ND 58274 | $153,993 |
32 | Ross Bradley Thykeson | Portland, ND 58274 | $153,993 |
33 | James Richard Law | Finley, ND 58230 | $150,957 |
34 | Michael Wayne Steinke | Hope, ND 58046 | $150,661 |
35 | Michael Hilbert Satrom | Galesburg, ND 58035 | $144,677 |
36 | Jason Scott Carlson | Finley, ND 58230 | $142,078 |
37 | David Karl Nygaard | Finley, ND 58230 | $139,986 |
38 | Skjoiten Farms Inc | Hatton, ND 58240 | $139,477 |
39 | Amb Brothers Farms | Portland, ND 58274 | $138,451 |
40 | Donald Allen Nygaard | Sharon, ND 58277 | $136,555 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”