Conservation Reserve Program in Stutsman County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 430
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Stutsman County, North Dakota totaled $2,876,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Stephen L Dockter | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $18,743 |
42 | Margaret Patricia Beckman | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $18,726 |
43 | Shirley A Mcmillan And Sharon M Falk Joint Irrv Fa | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $18,239 |
44 | Amundson Family Irrevocable Trust | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $17,358 |
45 | Beck Family Farm Irrevocable Trust | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $17,176 |
46 | Ronald L Krenz | Woodworth, ND 58496 | $17,127 |
47 | Darrell D Martin | Courtenay, ND 58426 | $16,371 |
48 | Alvin James Exner | Ypsilanti, ND 58497 | $16,326 |
49 | Reo Fandrich | Medina, ND 58467 | $16,070 |
50 | Paulette Peterson | Raymond, MN 56282 | $15,870 |
51 | Irene Nichols | Raymond, MN 56282 | $15,865 |
52 | Janice Hall | Raymond, MN 56282 | $15,865 |
53 | Douglas Howard Wede | Carrington, ND 58421 | $15,819 |
54 | Oscar Moser | Medina, ND 58467 | $15,774 |
55 | Lonnie Dockter | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $15,533 |
56 | Elaine Hattie Soupir | Courtenay, ND 58426 | $15,361 |
57 | Ellen D Orr | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $15,311 |
58 | Patricia Roemmich | Medina, ND 58467 | $15,306 |
59 | Dakota Heritage Bank Of North Dak ** | Hope, ND 58046 | $15,184 |
60 | Thomas Sweet | Woodworth, ND 58496 | $14,943 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”