Production Flexibility Program in Stutsman County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,603
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Stutsman County, North Dakota totaled $58,065,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Clifford Manley Orr | Ypsilanti, ND 58497 | $147,419 |
102 | Darron Dean Orr | Ypsilanti, ND 58497 | $147,415 |
103 | Troy Clifford Orr | Ypsilanti, ND 58497 | $147,397 |
104 | Joel Harold Lees | Buchanan, ND 58420 | $146,965 |
105 | Leroy Struxness | Carrington, ND 58421 | $146,618 |
106 | Jeremy Lynn Rittenbach | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $146,210 |
107 | Larry Readel | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $145,625 |
108 | Myron Hehn | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $145,304 |
109 | Harry James Martin | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $145,214 |
110 | Jolyne Ann Wegner | Jud, ND 58454 | $144,198 |
111 | Terry-terry L Nielan Lee Nieland | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $144,032 |
112 | Walter Roger Nieland | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $144,032 |
113 | Milton Iszler And Son | Fargo, ND 58103 | $143,158 |
114 | Eileen Posey | Pingree, ND 58476 | $143,075 |
115 | K Farms Inc | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $142,756 |
116 | James William Trautman | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $142,640 |
117 | Dale Ivan Diede | Pingree, ND 58476 | $142,627 |
118 | Don Lawrence Jr | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $141,742 |
119 | R & J Farms | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $141,588 |
120 | Steve C Erickson | Woodworth, ND 58496 | $140,549 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”