Total Conservation Programs in Stutsman County, North Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 365
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Stutsman County, North Dakota totaled $3,139,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Kim Christianson | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $8,437 |
122 | Kay Carpenter | Anaheim, CA 92801 | $8,437 |
123 | Dwight Hofmann | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $8,426 |
124 | Donald L/ June F Carlson Revocable Trust | Gainesville, FL 32605 | $8,417 |
125 | Roger K Schaffer | Cleveland, ND 58424 | $8,372 |
126 | Dean Allen Ova | Pingree, ND 58476 | $8,361 |
127 | Linda Rae Ova | Pingree, ND 58476 | $8,361 |
128 | R & K Ibes Family Limited Part | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $8,332 |
129 | Dustin Hoffmann | Medina, ND 58467 | $8,296 |
130 | Jay Noot | Marion, ND 58466 | $8,244 |
131 | Trent B Sletto | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $8,193 |
132 | Lu Ann S Martin | Courtenay, ND 58426 | $8,167 |
133 | Lemoine Klose | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $8,154 |
134 | Jasen Lorenz | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $7,965 |
135 | Joleen M Reiland-lorenz | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $7,965 |
136 | Clifton Scheaffer | Buchanan, ND 58420 | $7,828 |
137 | Darlene Kropp | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $7,775 |
138 | Clifford Kropp | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $7,774 |
139 | Lindsay Larrell Orr | Ypsilanti, ND 58497 | $7,738 |
140 | Rodney Mickelson | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $7,707 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”