Direct Payment Program in Towner County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,073
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Towner County, North Dakota totaled $55,873,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mark James Dease | Munich, ND 58352 | $300,795 |
22 | Bruce Allen Teubner | Cando, ND 58324 | $297,164 |
23 | Shannon Ray Mattson | Rolla, ND 58367 | $291,986 |
24 | Martin Jon Amble | Sarles, ND 58372 | $285,898 |
25 | Michael Edward Haberstroh | Rolla, ND 58367 | $275,906 |
26 | Arthur Tuomala | Rolla, ND 58367 | $270,608 |
27 | Myron Jacobsen | Rocklake, ND 58365 | $267,007 |
28 | Greg Plemel | Starkweather, ND 58377 | $265,662 |
29 | Ronald Tschepen | Bisbee, ND 58317 | $257,944 |
30 | Ellen Mae Slaubaugh | Wolford, ND 58385 | $257,100 |
31 | Paul Gerard Grann | Perth, ND 58363 | $253,651 |
32 | Gregory Erlin Westlind | Cando, ND 58324 | $253,307 |
33 | Todd E Oakland | Bisbee, ND 58317 | $252,137 |
34 | Dana Westemeier | Bisbee, ND 58317 | $251,154 |
35 | Carl Ernest Ahlberg | Leeds, ND 58346 | $245,652 |
36 | Mark Frederick Ahlberg | Leeds, ND 58346 | $245,403 |
37 | Darrell Dennis Odegaard | Egeland, ND 58331 | $243,103 |
38 | Jay Harold Nicholas | Cando, ND 58324 | $242,006 |
39 | Donald Vernon Bertsch | Starkweather, ND 58377 | $240,420 |
40 | Maureen Jane Bertsch | Starkweather, ND 58377 | $240,420 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”