Conservation Reserve Program in Traill County, North Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 260
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Traill County, North Dakota totaled $1,297,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Glenn Endrud | Buxton, ND 58218 | $8,309 |
42 | Robert B Olson | Northwood, ND 58267 | $8,085 |
43 | James Breidenbach | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $8,085 |
44 | Bradley Hegvick | Finley, ND 58230 | $8,058 |
45 | Michael J Reynolds | Portland, ND 58274 | $7,865 |
46 | Marvin Allan Sondrol | Reynolds, ND 58275 | $7,703 |
47 | Richard J Camrud | Buxton, ND 58218 | $7,314 |
48 | Raymond Zajac | Mantador, ND 58058 | $7,137 |
49 | , | $7,068 | |
50 | Larry Linneman | Reynolds, ND 58275 | $6,898 |
51 | Julia Ann Miller Revocable Living Trust Dated 3/01 | Glyndon, MN 56547 | $6,761 |
52 | Gordon A Irwin Farmland Trust A | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $6,721 |
53 | Steve Wesley Volla | Mayville, ND 58257 | $6,679 |
54 | Tanya Ann Novotny | Wyndmere, ND 58081 | $6,373 |
55 | Aarsvold Farms Inc | Blanchard, ND 58009 | $6,314 |
56 | Mary Post-bruce S Post And Mary E Post Rev Tr Post | Essex Junction, VT 05452 | $6,183 |
57 | Robert S Hauge | Mentor, MN 56736 | $5,988 |
58 | John Satrom | Galesburg, ND 58035 | $5,908 |
59 | Wendy J Kuntz Revocable Trust | Waconia, MN 55387 | $5,892 |
60 | Justin Earl Mueller | Cummings, ND 58223 | $5,892 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”