Counter Cyclical Program in Traill County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 592
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Traill County, North Dakota totaled $3,835,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Roger Dean Smette | Cummings, ND 58223 | $14,483 |
82 | Dolve-larson Frm Co | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $14,138 |
83 | Neil Scott Enger | Mayville, ND 58257 | $13,992 |
84 | Myron Breiland | Buxton, ND 58218 | $13,988 |
85 | Paul D Knudsvig | Mayville, ND 58257 | $13,752 |
86 | Parnell G Amb | Portland, ND 58274 | $13,745 |
87 | Scott John Rosevold | Mayville, ND 58257 | $13,415 |
88 | Pat Elliott | Hillsboro, ND 58045 | $13,287 |
89 | Corey Nathan Hanson | Portland, ND 58274 | $13,227 |
90 | Leon Carter Sand | Clifford, ND 58016 | $13,194 |
91 | Kenneth Wilbur Cotton | Hillsboro, ND 58045 | $13,155 |
92 | Gregory Kenneth Cotton | Hillsboro, ND 58045 | $13,151 |
93 | William Lyle Cotton | Hillsboro, ND 58045 | $13,151 |
94 | Merle Dennis Strand | Portland, ND 58274 | $12,797 |
95 | Richard Arvin Satrom | Grandin, ND 58038 | $12,461 |
96 | Mr Scott Malcolm Hong | Buxton, ND 58218 | $12,183 |
97 | Suzanne Joy Hong | Buxton, ND 58218 | $12,183 |
98 | Richard J Camrud | Buxton, ND 58218 | $12,160 |
99 | Michael Roger Anderson | Hillsboro, ND 58045 | $12,078 |
100 | Bruce Earl Christianson | Portland, ND 58274 | $11,964 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”