Conservation Reserve Program in Traill County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 663
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Traill County, North Dakota totaled $19,643,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Kent Paulson | Mayville, ND 58257 | $44,630 |
122 | Laila -laila G Stenb Stenberg | Pine Island, MN 55963 | $44,064 |
123 | , | $43,808 | |
124 | Ralph Fetter | Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 | $43,024 |
125 | Reuben Rud | Galesburg, ND 58035 | $42,995 |
126 | Keith Freeland | West Fargo, ND 58078 | $41,980 |
127 | Wendy J Kuntz Revocable Trust | Waconia, MN 55387 | $41,883 |
128 | Pete Kritzberger Inc | Hillsboro, ND 58045 | $41,501 |
129 | Kyle Loren Olson | Buxton, ND 58218 | $41,145 |
130 | Gordon A Irwin Farmland Trust A | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $40,911 |
131 | Earle D Lien | Fargo, ND 58104 | $39,890 |
132 | Brent Freeland | Mayville, ND 58257 | $39,762 |
133 | Donald W Kounovsky | Fargo, ND 58102 | $39,710 |
134 | Bonnie Freeland | Mayville, ND 58257 | $39,423 |
135 | James L Skarperud | Buxton, ND 58218 | $39,037 |
136 | Arlene Nelson | Mayville, ND 58257 | $38,936 |
137 | Carolyn Kryzsko | Grand Forks, ND 58203 | $38,874 |
138 | Michael Charles Bring | Galesburg, ND 58035 | $38,792 |
139 | Curtiss Ray Hovde | Portland, ND 58274 | $38,579 |
140 | Timothy Lloyd Overmoen | Hillsboro, ND 58045 | $38,116 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”