Farm Subsidy information
Walsh County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Walsh County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 998
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Walsh County, North Dakota totaled $72,691,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Judy Ann Keeley | Grafton, ND 58237 | $325,053 |
22 | Brandon & Richard Larson | Hoople, ND 58243 | $323,474 |
23 | Hankey Farm | Park River, ND 58270 | $318,815 |
24 | Jay Gudajtes Farm | Minto, ND 58261 | $318,588 |
25 | First United Bank ** | Park River, ND 58270 | $318,297 |
26 | Weinlaeder Farms | Drayton, ND 58225 | $317,091 |
27 | Kadlec Farms | Adams, ND 58210 | $316,628 |
28 | Paul Franklin Grzadzielewski | Manvel, ND 58256 | $313,256 |
29 | T And G Farms | Hoople, ND 58243 | $313,096 |
30 | Dennis L Dipple | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $310,968 |
31 | Zikmund Farm Partnership | Forest River, ND 58233 | $310,785 |
32 | Midgarden Potato Company | Hoople, ND 58243 | $289,913 |
33 | K-bro Farms | Pisek, ND 58273 | $281,853 |
34 | Torkelson Bros Inc | Grafton, ND 58237 | $278,497 |
35 | Evergreen Farms | Grafton, ND 58237 | $275,195 |
36 | Shirek Farms | Lankin, ND 58250 | $273,977 |
37 | Matthew Henry Rudnik | Grafton, ND 58237 | $261,347 |
38 | Darren Jaymes Kadlec | Pisek, ND 58273 | $258,656 |
39 | Lane Dennis Bina | Lawton, ND 58345 | $255,487 |
40 | Leclerc/dennis And Scott Farms | Grafton, ND 58237 | $251,694 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”