Conservation Reserve Program in Walsh County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 651
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Walsh County, North Dakota totaled $3,018,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Marlin Bata | Adams, ND 58210 | $11,544 |
62 | Carol Veum | Adams, ND 58210 | $11,536 |
63 | Patricia A Bata | Adams, ND 58210 | $11,352 |
64 | Kathleen Snell | Andover, MN 55304 | $11,337 |
65 | Noel Moe | Grafton, ND 58237 | $10,896 |
66 | Kenneth Matejcek | Horace, ND 58047 | $10,687 |
67 | Bonnie Powers | Sheridan, WY 82801 | $10,687 |
68 | Garrett Skorheim | Fordville, ND 58231 | $10,606 |
69 | Jorandby Family Revocable Trust | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $10,568 |
70 | Dennis Lovcik | Pisek, ND 58273 | $10,496 |
71 | Kelly G Nichols | Marshall, MN 56258 | $10,439 |
72 | Cynthia Nichols | Marshall, MN 56258 | $10,439 |
73 | Jay W Skorheim | Park River, ND 58270 | $10,346 |
74 | Gregg Krebsbach | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $10,192 |
75 | Margaret Umphrey | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $10,010 |
76 | Mark M Bata | Park River, ND 58270 | $9,956 |
77 | Jay Hogfoss | Fairdale, ND 58229 | $9,929 |
78 | Warren L Nelson | Fairdale, ND 58229 | $9,826 |
79 | Flanders Family Revocable Trust | Minto, ND 58261 | $9,825 |
80 | Dean Hosna | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $9,740 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”