Farm Subsidy information
Walsh County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Walsh County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,098
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Walsh County, North Dakota totaled $51,354,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Pinta Brothers Llp | Grafton, ND 58237 | $90,620 |
82 | Thomas Bruce Fagerholt | Hoople, ND 58243 | $88,120 |
83 | Citizens State Bank Of Lankin ** | Lankin, ND 58250 | $84,992 |
84 | Kdl Olmstead Farms LLC | Grafton, ND 58237 | $84,483 |
85 | Travis Grant Uggerud | Drayton, ND 58225 | $84,478 |
86 | Sara J Schuchard-mcgregor | Fairdale, ND 58229 | $84,248 |
87 | Michael Lynn Johnson | Fordville, ND 58231 | $82,520 |
88 | Matthew Henry Rudnik | Grafton, ND 58237 | $82,024 |
89 | H R Kingsbury Co Inc | Grafton, ND 58237 | $81,158 |
90 | Zikmund Farm Partnership | Forest River, ND 58233 | $79,803 |
91 | Suda/cyril E And Sons | Grafton, ND 58237 | $79,717 |
92 | K-bro Farms | Pisek, ND 58273 | $79,628 |
93 | Sudak Farm Inc | Grafton, ND 58237 | $79,532 |
94 | Doug Davis Farm Inc | Grafton, ND 58237 | $79,250 |
95 | Ddc Rudnik Farms | Grafton, ND 58237 | $78,926 |
96 | Darryl Collette | Grafton, ND 58237 | $77,927 |
97 | Joseph L Bata | Adams, ND 58210 | $77,885 |
98 | Erickson Brothers | Hoople, ND 58243 | $77,360 |
99 | Andrew Paul Berntson | Adams, ND 58210 | $77,308 |
100 | Charles Frank Bina | Lankin, ND 58250 | $74,768 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”