Market Gains in Walsh County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 286
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Walsh County, North Dakota totaled $1,693,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Larry Coulthart | Grafton, ND 58237 | $4,146 |
122 | Gary Allen Schultz | Minto, ND 58261 | $4,091 |
123 | Lane Dennis Bina | Lawton, ND 58345 | $4,033 |
124 | Jackson Farms Inc | Hoople, ND 58243 | $3,996 |
125 | Roger Herman Schuster | Minto, ND 58261 | $3,981 |
126 | Sandra Susan Schuster | Minto, ND 58261 | $3,981 |
127 | Campbell Farms | Grafton, ND 58237 | $3,972 |
128 | Carroll Farm Inc | Forest River, ND 58233 | $3,921 |
129 | Roger Osowski | Grafton, ND 58237 | $3,825 |
130 | David Eugene Linstad | Adams, ND 58210 | $3,792 |
131 | Dennis Dale Brodina | Lankin, ND 58250 | $3,765 |
132 | Russel Oliver Carlson | Lankin, ND 58250 | $3,714 |
133 | Candace Lee Carlson | Lankin, ND 58250 | $3,714 |
134 | Michael John Grzadzielewski | Ardoch, ND 58261 | $3,552 |
135 | L John Kubousek | Forest River, ND 58233 | $3,384 |
136 | John D Miller | Minto, ND 58261 | $3,324 |
137 | Curtis Allen Sorbo | Adams, ND 58210 | $3,238 |
138 | Steven Michael Dahl | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $3,209 |
139 | Vasichek Brothers | Michigan, ND 58259 | $3,149 |
140 | Bryan Frank Wippler | Lankin, ND 58250 | $3,130 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”