Market Gains in Walsh County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 286
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Walsh County, North Dakota totaled $1,693,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Donald John Rudnik | Minto, ND 58261 | $3,115 |
142 | Joseph Isadore Rudnik | Minto, ND 58261 | $3,115 |
143 | Jeremy Setness | Park River, ND 58270 | $3,102 |
144 | Charles Hodek Jr | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $3,096 |
145 | Howard W Strand | Brocket, ND 58321 | $3,037 |
146 | Michael Evan Stoltman | Minto, ND 58261 | $3,032 |
147 | Allen Swartz | Park River, ND 58270 | $2,959 |
148 | Louis Leonard Slominski | Minto, ND 58261 | $2,847 |
149 | Chad Michael Lindell | Adams, ND 58210 | $2,835 |
150 | Randy Thomas Gemmill | Edinburg, ND 58227 | $2,796 |
151 | Richard W Larson | Hoople, ND 58243 | $2,785 |
152 | Robert Larson | Park River, ND 58270 | $2,784 |
153 | Burbidge-askim | Park River, ND 58270 | $2,780 |
154 | Gilbert Sampel | Forest River, ND 58233 | $2,681 |
155 | Mark Charles Hodek | Fairdale, ND 58229 | $2,672 |
156 | Jon Mcmillan | Fordville, ND 58231 | $2,574 |
157 | Rory Dene Lorenz | Lawton, ND 58345 | $2,537 |
158 | Gran-um | Minneapolis, MN 55417 | $2,410 |
159 | Matthew Allen Gerszewski | Grafton, ND 58237 | $2,404 |
160 | Merlyn Frank Feltman | Grafton, ND 58237 | $2,334 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”