Farm Subsidy information
Walsh County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Walsh County, North Dakota, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 997
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Walsh County, North Dakota totaled $39,036,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | Mark A Novak | Lankin, ND 58250 | $97,812 |
| 42 | Paul Franklin Grzadzielewski | Manvel, ND 58256 | $97,113 |
| 43 | David And Jackie Linstad Farms | Adams, ND 58210 | $96,620 |
| 44 | G & B Thompson Partnership | Grafton, ND 58237 | $94,339 |
| 45 | Schanilec Farms Inc | Minto, ND 58261 | $93,115 |
| 46 | Darren Jaymes Kadlec | Pisek, ND 58273 | $89,328 |
| 47 | Chris Thompson Farms Inc | Grafton, ND 58237 | $86,833 |
| 48 | Nilson Farms | Hoople, ND 58243 | $86,703 |
| 49 | Leclerc/dennis And Scott Farms | Grafton, ND 58237 | $86,584 |
| 50 | Andrew Paul Grzadzieleski | Drayton, ND 58225 | $86,303 |
| 51 | Sara J Schuchard-mcgregor | Fairdale, ND 58229 | $84,377 |
| 52 | Daniel And Ernest Dusek | Grafton, ND 58237 | $83,852 |
| 53 | Hurtt Seed Farm | Hoople, ND 58243 | $83,552 |
| 54 | Mark E Novak | Lankin, ND 58250 | $83,312 |
| 55 | Scott Heffta | Adams, ND 58210 | $82,046 |
| 56 | Oberg Farms | Hoople, ND 58243 | $80,647 |
| 57 | Sobak Farms | Fairdale, ND 58229 | $79,490 |
| 58 | John F Desautel Farming Co | Grafton, ND 58237 | $78,541 |
| 59 | David K Osowski And Sons Inc | Minto, ND 58261 | $77,532 |
| 60 | Gem Farm Inc | Drayton, ND 58225 | $75,817 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf