Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Wells County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 392
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Wells County, North Dakota totaled $36,438,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ladell Hagen | Cathay, ND 58422 | $279,628 |
22 | Jeff S Ebel Farm Inc | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $274,017 |
23 | Mark Lange | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $270,439 |
24 | Herman Widicker Farms | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $266,867 |
25 | Todd James Mckinven | Martin, ND 58758 | $264,285 |
26 | Amberland Farms Inc | Harvey, ND 58341 | $262,895 |
27 | Prairie Rose Farms Inc | Cathay, ND 58422 | $260,766 |
28 | Robert Jay Kleinsasser | Hurdsfield, ND 58451 | $250,313 |
29 | Tyrone Eugene Unruh | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $248,552 |
30 | Jeffrey Russell Kleinsasser | Chaseley, ND 58423 | $245,952 |
31 | Paul Quentin Anderson | Harvey, ND 58341 | $245,636 |
32 | David James Fike | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $244,314 |
33 | Roxane Fike | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $244,314 |
34 | Jerome Risovi | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $240,104 |
35 | Jon Matthew Polries | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $237,947 |
36 | Jadin Riedesel | Cathay, ND 58422 | $234,512 |
37 | Beck Farms Inc | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $232,513 |
38 | Josef Michael Richter | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $230,209 |
39 | David James Richter | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $229,675 |
40 | Germantown Hills Inc | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $223,001 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”