Farm Subsidy information
Wells County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Wells County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 554
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Wells County, North Dakota totaled $72,241,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Celine Ann Bollingberg | Cathay, ND 58422 | $286,896 |
42 | Michael James Seibel | Harvey, ND 58341 | $282,422 |
43 | James Allen Mertz | Hurdsfield, ND 58451 | $274,050 |
44 | Jamie Michael Richter | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $272,813 |
45 | Todd James Mckinven | Martin, ND 58758 | $269,748 |
46 | Jon Matthew Polries | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $265,205 |
47 | Kurt Olaf Bollingberg | Cathay, ND 58422 | $264,149 |
48 | Gerald Klindworth | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $262,142 |
49 | Royd Alan Unruh | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $261,335 |
50 | Jeff S Ebel Farm Inc | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $259,218 |
51 | Hager's Acres Inc | Harvey, ND 58341 | $256,683 |
52 | Robert Allen Martin | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $256,366 |
53 | Jerome Risovi | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $254,126 |
54 | Agri-mason Farms Inc | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $250,930 |
55 | Prairie Rose Farms Inc | Cathay, ND 58422 | $249,359 |
56 | Bibelheimer Farms, Inc. | Cathay, ND 58422 | $247,394 |
57 | Josef Michael Richter | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $237,393 |
58 | Whitney Marie Hoff | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $237,112 |
59 | Gage Bollingberg | Cathay, ND 58422 | $234,935 |
60 | Beck Farms Inc | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $231,764 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”