Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Wells County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 82
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Wells County, North Dakota totaled $3,821,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Joshua Peter Shockman | Berlin, ND 58415 | $19,407 |
42 | Trista Louise Shockman | Berlin, ND 58415 | $19,407 |
43 | Troy A Lura | Cathay, ND 58422 | $16,288 |
44 | Donald Paul Allmaras | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $15,600 |
45 | Faul Jerome/agnes Jv | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $13,406 |
46 | Scott Fleming | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $12,209 |
47 | Randal Jerome Lura | Carrington, ND 58421 | $11,775 |
48 | Rocky Fleming | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $10,364 |
49 | Gage Bollingberg | Cathay, ND 58422 | $10,318 |
50 | Lewis Seibold | Cathay, ND 58422 | $9,669 |
51 | Frederick Francis Richter | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $7,024 |
52 | Charles Nyhus | Harvey, ND 58341 | $6,952 |
53 | Sharon Nyhus | Harvey, ND 58341 | $6,952 |
54 | Kristopher Allen Clarke | Crary, ND 58327 | $6,773 |
55 | Winsness Farm Partnership Llp | Anderson, SC 29626 | $6,719 |
56 | Bonita Marie Faul | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $6,697 |
57 | Michael Lee Faul | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $6,697 |
58 | Brian Paul Thomas | Denhoff, ND 58430 | $6,641 |
59 | Douglas Howard Wede | Carrington, ND 58421 | $5,782 |
60 | Walter Fehr Estate | Drayton, ND 58225 | $5,392 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”