Total Emergency Relief Program in Wells County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 341
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Wells County, North Dakota totaled $43,167,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jamie Michael Richter | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $279,972 |
42 | , | $277,935 | |
43 | D T Long Farm And Ranch | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $273,800 |
44 | Todd James Mckinven | Martin, ND 58758 | $272,740 |
45 | Troy Hafner | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $270,453 |
46 | Bibelheimer Farms, Inc. | Cathay, ND 58422 | $267,321 |
47 | Kurt Olaf Bollingberg | Cathay, ND 58422 | $267,014 |
48 | Gerald Klindworth | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $266,664 |
49 | James Allen Mertz | Hurdsfield, ND 58451 | $265,723 |
50 | Celine Ann Bollingberg | Cathay, ND 58422 | $264,131 |
51 | Jon Matthew Polries | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $263,300 |
52 | Royd Alan Unruh | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $261,306 |
53 | Prairie Rose Farms Inc | Cathay, ND 58422 | $253,092 |
54 | Jeff S Ebel Farm Inc | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $251,948 |
55 | Mackrill Honey Farm & Sales Inc | Cathay, ND 58422 | $250,000 |
56 | Agri-mason Farms Inc | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $249,234 |
57 | Whitney Marie Hoff | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $248,501 |
58 | Robert Allen Martin | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $248,228 |
59 | Gage Bollingberg | Cathay, ND 58422 | $245,832 |
60 | Josef Michael Richter | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $244,770 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”