Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Wells County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 82
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Wells County, North Dakota totaled $3,821,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jadin Riedesel | Cathay, ND 58422 | $3,906 |
62 | Arden Georgeson | Heimdal, ND 58341 | $3,759 |
63 | Casey Richard Jensen | Harvey, ND 58341 | $3,611 |
64 | Peter Orville Shockman | Berlin, ND 58415 | $3,217 |
65 | Joan Louise Shockman | Berlin, ND 58415 | $3,217 |
66 | Daniel Melaas | Anamoose, ND 58710 | $2,898 |
67 | Sam A Kleinsasser | Chaseley, ND 58423 | $2,713 |
68 | Leona Fehr | Drayton, ND 58225 | $2,696 |
69 | Alan Willyard | Carrington, ND 58421 | $2,478 |
70 | Maia M Leon | Santa Monica, CA 90402 | $1,487 |
71 | Justin Ystaas | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $953 |
72 | William F Buechler Jr | Brentwood, TN 37027 | $937 |
73 | Amanda Renee Martin | Hurdsfield, ND 58451 | $798 |
74 | Mike Kopseng | Harvey, ND 58341 | $755 |
75 | Jane Uggerud | Drayton, ND 58225 | $688 |
76 | Robert Fehr | Piedmont, SD 57769 | $688 |
77 | Richard Fehr | Lakewood, CO 80215 | $688 |
78 | Marne Wilson | Parkersburg, WV 26101 | $688 |
79 | James Theodore Shockman | Berlin, ND 58415 | $619 |
80 | Wendell Grondahl | Maddock, ND 58348 | $245 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”