Total Commodity Programs in Wells County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 478
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Wells County, North Dakota totaled $12,621,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Ross Lindgren | Maddock, ND 58348 | $65,257 |
62 | Michael Darin Schaefer | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $63,267 |
63 | David James Fike | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $62,917 |
64 | Michael James Seibel | Harvey, ND 58341 | $62,545 |
65 | Dustin Ross Kost | Cathay, ND 58422 | $62,218 |
66 | Jeffrey Allen Schafer | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $61,767 |
67 | Mark Lange | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $61,531 |
68 | Robin Leroy Weisz | Hurdsfield, ND 58451 | $60,560 |
69 | Freedom Farms Inc | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $59,508 |
70 | Nathan Kreiter | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $59,177 |
71 | Bibelheimer Farms, Inc. | Cathay, ND 58422 | $58,260 |
72 | Michael Alveshere | Harvey, ND 58341 | $57,875 |
73 | Thomas B Alveshere | Harvey, ND 58341 | $57,856 |
74 | Celine Ann Bollingberg | Cathay, ND 58422 | $57,386 |
75 | Roxane Fike | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $57,256 |
76 | David James Richter | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $56,466 |
77 | Ronald S Keller | Harvey, ND 58341 | $56,374 |
78 | Tyrone Eugene Unruh | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $56,113 |
79 | Donald Paul Allmaras | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $56,020 |
80 | Robert Allen Martin | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $55,611 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”