Loan Deficiency in Wells County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 928
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Wells County, North Dakota totaled $28,368,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Douglas Wayne Olschlager | Harvey, ND 58341 | $108,303 |
82 | Michael Arthur Weigelt | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $107,912 |
83 | Keith Wayland Patzer Estate | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $107,368 |
84 | James Richard Neumiller | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $107,194 |
85 | Valgene Kreiter | Heaton, ND 58418 | $106,208 |
86 | Larry Jones | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $106,137 |
87 | Gerald Klindworth | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $105,896 |
88 | Kenneth Jay Schild | Harvey, ND 58341 | $104,748 |
89 | Don Seltvedt | Harvey, ND 58341 | $101,457 |
90 | Lanette Mertz | Hurdsfield, ND 58451 | $101,276 |
91 | Richard Heilman | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $99,582 |
92 | Rick D Neumiller | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $97,520 |
93 | Ordean Ebel Farm Llp | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $95,897 |
94 | Jerome Fike | Chaseley, ND 58423 | $95,815 |
95 | David Clough | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $95,719 |
96 | Riedesel Farm Inc | Carrington, ND 58421 | $95,595 |
97 | Darin Jones | Heaton, ND 58418 | $95,203 |
98 | John W Hitz | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $94,657 |
99 | John Julius Mertz Estate | Hurdsfield, ND 58451 | $94,416 |
100 | Royd Alan Unruh | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $94,057 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”