Direct Payment Program in Wells County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,071
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Wells County, North Dakota totaled $54,448,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Reade Allen Neumiller | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $181,864 |
102 | Jennifer Elizabeth Mertz | Hurdsfield, ND 58451 | $181,208 |
103 | Frederick Francis Richter | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $179,818 |
104 | Donald Kenneth Long | Heaton, ND 58418 | $177,767 |
105 | Kathy Muscha Farm Inc | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $176,809 |
106 | David Lill | Cathay, ND 58422 | $176,666 |
107 | J & P Meier Inc | Cathay, ND 58422 | $175,771 |
108 | Loren James Patrie | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $173,991 |
109 | Michael Darin Schaefer | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $172,145 |
110 | Deede Farm Inc | Harvey, ND 58341 | $170,067 |
111 | Riedesel Farm Inc | Carrington, ND 58421 | $170,038 |
112 | David Mark Young | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $169,259 |
113 | Jerry Albert Schuster | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $169,147 |
114 | Richard Lee Pfeiffer | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $168,677 |
115 | Jamie Michael Richter | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $167,991 |
116 | Troy A Lura | Cathay, ND 58422 | $167,714 |
117 | Tom Alan Reichenberger | Cathay, ND 58422 | $166,228 |
118 | Robert Jay Kleinsasser | Hurdsfield, ND 58451 | $165,752 |
119 | David Clough | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $164,295 |
120 | Gunderson Farms Inc | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $163,110 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”