Farm Subsidy information
Wells County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Wells County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 2,595
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Wells County, North Dakota totaled $726,110,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Amberland Farms Inc | Harvey, ND 58341 | $1,027,856 |
122 | Curtis Ray Wiesz | Heaton, ND 58418 | $1,027,628 |
123 | Anton Eugene Hoff | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $1,024,348 |
124 | Steven Ray Seibel | Harvey, ND 58341 | $1,019,171 |
125 | Deede Farm Inc | Harvey, ND 58341 | $1,014,392 |
126 | Josef Michael Richter | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $1,013,906 |
127 | Lloyd Crop Management Inc | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $989,819 |
128 | Rodney Rappuhn | West Fargo, ND 58078 | $988,115 |
129 | Todd Martin Grager | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $985,419 |
130 | Muscha Family Ag | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $984,462 |
131 | Tyler Jones | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $982,255 |
132 | David Allen Kopseng | Harvey, ND 58341 | $967,687 |
133 | Jeffrey Alan Ellingson | Maddock, ND 58348 | $960,614 |
134 | Michael Ray Flick | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $923,501 |
135 | Louis Marvin Schaefer | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $899,221 |
136 | Michael Alveshere | Harvey, ND 58341 | $899,036 |
137 | John Stuart Mertz | Hurdsfield, ND 58451 | $896,041 |
138 | David Roger Flick | Chaseley, ND 58423 | $895,501 |
139 | Chris Sellie | Cathay, ND 58422 | $894,031 |
140 | Mark Sellie | Cathay, ND 58422 | $893,848 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”