Farm Subsidy information
Wells County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Wells County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 635
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Wells County, North Dakota totaled $40,362,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Alton Raymond Zerr | Harvey, ND 58341 | $60,803 |
122 | Josef Michael Richter | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $60,614 |
123 | Sara Richter | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $60,614 |
124 | Kelly D Dockter | Hurdsfield, ND 58451 | $59,523 |
125 | Jamie Michael Richter | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $59,139 |
126 | Mccormick Steven Erfle | Heaton, ND 58418 | $58,726 |
127 | Thomas Micheal Wachtel | Cathay, ND 58422 | $58,409 |
128 | Jeffrey Alan Ellingson | Maddock, ND 58348 | $58,077 |
129 | Scott Alan Schmitz | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $57,508 |
130 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $57,262 |
131 | Larry Fandrich | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $57,140 |
132 | Community Credit Union ** | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $56,821 |
133 | Ronald S Keller | Harvey, ND 58341 | $56,374 |
134 | Lowell Dean Rau | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $55,520 |
135 | Tyler Weigelt | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $54,373 |
136 | Reade Allen Neumiller | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $54,346 |
137 | Scott Fleming | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $53,035 |
138 | Bremer Bank ** | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $52,953 |
139 | Robert James Marcotte | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $52,109 |
140 | Noah Ellingson | Maddock, ND 58348 | $50,996 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”