Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Wells County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 181
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Wells County, North Dakota totaled $1,151,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | James Rudolph Kutz | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $2,052 |
122 | Rodney Opdahl | Manfred, ND 58341 | $1,991 |
123 | Justin Risovi | Hillsboro, ND 58045 | $1,984 |
124 | Bobby Hoyt | Mchenry, ND 58464 | $1,961 |
125 | Paul Quentin Anderson | Harvey, ND 58341 | $1,920 |
126 | Ron Alvin Schimelfenig | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $1,913 |
127 | Bill Stone | Knox, ND 58343 | $1,838 |
128 | Jacob Allen Brynjulson | Hurdsfield, ND 58451 | $1,830 |
129 | Tyler Mertz | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $1,811 |
130 | Levi Faul | Hurdsfield, ND 58451 | $1,755 |
131 | Steven Arthur Erfle | Heaton, ND 58418 | $1,673 |
132 | Kerry Schimke | Harvey, ND 58341 | $1,638 |
133 | Tristin Schimke | Hurdsfield, ND 58451 | $1,638 |
134 | Timothy L Rhone | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $1,620 |
135 | Thomas Micheal Wachtel | Cathay, ND 58422 | $1,613 |
136 | Allen Raymond Zerr | Harvey, ND 58341 | $1,594 |
137 | Justin J Zerr | Harvey, ND 58341 | $1,594 |
138 | Quentin Lange | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $1,510 |
139 | James Rott | Anamoose, ND 58710 | $1,504 |
140 | Michael Rott | Anamoose, ND 58710 | $1,504 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”