Total Disaster Programs in Wells County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,328
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Wells County, North Dakota totaled $95,218,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Royd Alan Unruh | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $459,719 |
42 | Dustin Ross Kost | Cathay, ND 58422 | $458,873 |
43 | Bibelheimer Farms, Inc. | Cathay, ND 58422 | $457,101 |
44 | A & S Heilman Farms, Inc | Harvey, ND 58341 | $455,424 |
45 | Steven Jones | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $448,191 |
46 | Troy Jones | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $441,924 |
47 | Jamie Michael Richter | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $439,922 |
48 | Jeffrey Lawrence Mertz | Hurdsfield, ND 58451 | $438,406 |
49 | Skiftun Farms Inc | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $437,407 |
50 | Reade Allen Neumiller | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $435,138 |
51 | Kenneth Jay Schild | Harvey, ND 58341 | $435,058 |
52 | Thomas Micheal Wachtel | Cathay, ND 58422 | $432,973 |
53 | Jon Matthew Polries | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $429,334 |
54 | Ladell Hagen | Cathay, ND 58422 | $419,456 |
55 | Michael Arthur Weigelt | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $411,155 |
56 | Michael Darin Schaefer | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $405,145 |
57 | Darwin Donald Hagemeister | Cathay, ND 58422 | $402,016 |
58 | Mark Gerald Hagemeister | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $400,870 |
59 | Jerome Ernest Hagemeister | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $399,231 |
60 | Jeanne Marie Unruh | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $393,953 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”