Total Commodity Programs in Wells County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,026
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Wells County, North Dakota totaled $268,449,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | S & P Mckinven Farms, Inc. | Harvey, ND 58341 | $1,207,081 |
42 | Jeffrey Russell Kleinsasser | Chaseley, ND 58423 | $1,203,174 |
43 | Jon Skiftun | Harvey, ND 58341 | $1,169,172 |
44 | James Richard Neumiller | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $1,160,562 |
45 | Troy A Lura | Cathay, ND 58422 | $1,159,888 |
46 | Agri-mason Farms Inc | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $1,157,962 |
47 | Kevin Frederick Ebel | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $1,157,504 |
48 | Brent Jerome Kurtz | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $1,125,116 |
49 | Rodney Buxa | Anamoose, ND 58710 | $1,122,537 |
50 | Robert Allen Martin | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $1,122,526 |
51 | Paul J Kirkeide | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $1,118,774 |
52 | Jeff S Ebel Farm Inc | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $1,118,353 |
53 | Darwin Donald Hagemeister | Cathay, ND 58422 | $1,117,364 |
54 | Troy Jones | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $1,115,905 |
55 | Royd Alan Unruh | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $1,100,433 |
56 | Darin Jones | Heaton, ND 58418 | $1,079,006 |
57 | Todd Jones | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $1,076,672 |
58 | Dakota Heritage Bank Of North Dak ** | Hope, ND 58046 | $1,072,396 |
59 | Michael Arthur Weigelt | Fessenden, ND 58438 | $1,066,693 |
60 | Mark Lange | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $1,065,219 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”