Farm Subsidy information
Williams County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Williams County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 701
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Williams County, North Dakota totaled $52,012,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Douglas Wayne Cvancara | Wildrose, ND 58795 | $191,239 |
62 | Dallas Cornell Lalim | Tioga, ND 58852 | $190,726 |
63 | Garrett Le Lalim | Tioga, ND 58852 | $189,647 |
64 | John Berg | Williston, ND 58801 | $187,829 |
65 | Tammy Rae Muller | Grenora, ND 58845 | $187,783 |
66 | Steven Craig Muller | Grenora, ND 58845 | $187,783 |
67 | Rickie Allen Sorenson | Williston, ND 58801 | $185,972 |
68 | Andrew Skaare | Alamo, ND 58830 | $184,707 |
69 | Casey Gunlikson | Williston, ND 58801 | $182,204 |
70 | Donald Schilke | Alamo, ND 58830 | $180,357 |
71 | Christopher Loren Vallevik | Williston, ND 58801 | $178,448 |
72 | Stanley James Larson | Williston, ND 58801 | $177,798 |
73 | Bradley James Olson | Williston, ND 58801 | $177,113 |
74 | Wade Mylo Gafkjen | Williston, ND 58801 | $176,395 |
75 | Jared Duane Gafkjen | Williston, ND 58801 | $174,370 |
76 | Daryn Darette Smith | Zahl, ND 58856 | $173,283 |
77 | Douglas Norman Christopherson | Epping, ND 58843 | $171,273 |
78 | Anton Cvancara | Wildrose, ND 58795 | $169,730 |
79 | Devyn Delette Smith | Zahl, ND 58856 | $167,321 |
80 | Myron Obert Lee | Williston, ND 58801 | $164,814 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”