Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Ohio, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,512
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Ohio totaled $64,708,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Sheaffer Farms Inc | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $161,679 |
22 | Vonderhaar Farms Inc | Camden, OH 45311 | $157,212 |
23 | Roberts Farms | Morral, OH 43337 | $156,309 |
24 | A B M Farms | Edison, OH 43320 | $155,318 |
25 | Barnes Family Farms | Williamsport, OH 43164 | $153,776 |
26 | Four County Grain | Bellevue, OH 44811 | $152,816 |
27 | Spellmire Brothers | Lebanon, OH 45036 | $152,786 |
28 | Michael T Hummel | Canal Winchester, OH 43110 | $150,702 |
29 | Watkins Farm | Kenton, OH 43326 | $149,784 |
30 | R Wayne Ellis | Wilmington, OH 45177 | $141,991 |
31 | Islercrest Farms Inc | Prospect, OH 43342 | $141,631 |
32 | Gary Stahlheber | Camden, OH 45311 | $139,208 |
33 | Hmw Agri Services Inc | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $136,739 |
34 | Michael Mcfadden | Sabina, OH 45169 | $132,436 |
35 | Landis Brothers | Baltimore, OH 43105 | $130,307 |
36 | David C Williams | South Salem, OH 45681 | $127,857 |
37 | Thompson Creek Farms Inc | South Solon, OH 43153 | $127,462 |
38 | Roy A And Judith A Loudenslager Partnership | Marion, OH 43302 | $127,414 |
39 | Carraher Ag Co | Mowrystown, OH 45155 | $126,384 |
40 | Tiffin Valley Farms | Stryker, OH 43557 | $126,366 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”