Counter Cyclical Program in Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 49,757
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Ohio totaled $267,500,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Haerr Grain Farms | Springfield, OH 45502 | $150,340 |
22 | Manchester Farms | Lakeview, OH 43331 | $144,582 |
23 | Drj Farms | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $144,216 |
24 | Corcoran Farms General Partnership | Chillicothe, OH 45601 | $142,360 |
25 | Corcoran Brothers Ag | Chillicothe, OH 45601 | $141,710 |
26 | Gracely Bros | Marion, OH 43302 | $138,158 |
27 | B H Rivers & Sons | Wshngtn Ct Hs, OH 43160 | $137,114 |
28 | Clifton Brothers Partnership | Circleville, OH 43113 | $136,802 |
29 | Miller Brothers | Bucyrus, OH 44820 | $136,726 |
30 | Tri-view Farms | Bellevue, OH 44811 | $135,356 |
31 | Hord Grain & Land Company | Bucyrus, OH 44820 | $132,728 |
32 | Sollars Farms | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $132,725 |
33 | Carl Atley Farms | Xenia, OH 45385 | $131,000 |
34 | Roberts Farms | Morral, OH 43337 | $130,006 |
35 | Metzger Brothers Farms | Circleville, OH 43113 | $127,672 |
36 | Lepley Farms | Bellevue, OH 44811 | $127,214 |
37 | Denton Farms | Cardington, OH 43315 | $125,308 |
38 | Triangle Farms | New London, OH 44851 | $125,198 |
39 | Maurer Farms | Vermilion, OH 44089 | $122,089 |
40 | Kilbarger Brothers LLC | Thornville, OH 43076 | $121,516 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”