Conservation Reserve Program in Ohio, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 45,188
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Ohio totaled $1,098,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Richards Land Co | Circleville, OH 43113 | $618,947 |
42 | Joe Dresbach Revocable Trust | Chillicothe, OH 45601 | $610,557 |
43 | A Gabriel Farms | Circleville, OH 43113 | $603,537 |
44 | Angela Head | Blue Ash, OH 45242 | $602,907 |
45 | Matthews Hereford Farm | New York, NY 10075 | $600,031 |
46 | Michael A Corcoran Inc | Chillicothe, OH 45601 | $598,835 |
47 | David L Allen | Springfield, OH 45502 | $596,524 |
48 | Burley Farms Inc | Prospect, OH 43342 | $596,198 |
49 | Gracely Farms Inc | Marion, OH 43302 | $595,336 |
50 | Steve Yahn | Clarksburg, OH 43115 | $591,452 |
51 | Marlene Dresbach Revocable Trust | Chillicothe, OH 45601 | $589,084 |
52 | Cecil Roll | Kingston, OH 45644 | $585,312 |
53 | Dwight E Hassan | Ada, OH 45810 | $584,566 |
54 | Dorothy L Welch | Mechanicsburg, OH 43044 | $583,289 |
55 | Janice K Irvine Tr | Greenfield, OH 45123 | $583,195 |
56 | Rebecca Dresbach | Chillicothe, OH 45601 | $581,111 |
57 | Conn Farms Inc | Jeffersonville, OH 43128 | $579,693 |
58 | Joe N Dresbach II | Chillicothe, OH 45601 | $577,649 |
59 | Doug Salyers | London, OH 43140 | $574,778 |
60 | Jason Unger | Greenfield, OH 45123 | $570,979 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”