Farm Subsidy information
Adams County, Ohio
Total Subsidies in Adams County, Ohio, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 3,828
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Adams County, Ohio totaled $82,902,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61 | Matthew T Nichols | Peebles, OH 45660 | $212,628 |
| 62 | Charles Palmer | Seaman, OH 45679 | $210,231 |
| 63 | David Matt Jamison | Peebles, OH 45660 | $210,170 |
| 64 | Ronald Jodrey | Winchester, OH 45697 | $208,955 |
| 65 | Palmer Valley View Farm | Seaman, OH 45679 | $206,225 |
| 66 | Stephen D Wamsley | Winchester, OH 45697 | $205,687 |
| 67 | Nathan Cluxton | Peebles, OH 45660 | $202,724 |
| 68 | David M Semple | Seaman, OH 45679 | $201,809 |
| 69 | Deborah Abbott | West Union, OH 45693 | $198,038 |
| 70 | Jon Paul Kennedy | Seaman, OH 45679 | $197,919 |
| 71 | Treber Grooms | West Union, OH 45693 | $195,066 |
| 72 | Christopher Mark Erwin | Winchester, OH 45697 | $193,403 |
| 73 | Margaret Tcheng | Montgomery, OH 45242 | $192,876 |
| 74 | Dan Fristoe | Peebles, OH 45660 | $188,677 |
| 75 | William Ashley Seaman | West Union, OH 45693 | $187,464 |
| 76 | Mollie Lee Williams | Peebles, OH 45660 | $186,777 |
| 77 | Roy Starline Jr | Peebles, OH 45660 | $186,531 |
| 78 | Tyler Whisman | Blue Creek, OH 45616 | $183,561 |
| 79 | Chad Mcdowell | Seaman, OH 45679 | $176,871 |
| 80 | Richard L Davis | West Union, OH 45693 | $176,844 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf