Total Conservation Programs in Auglaize County, Ohio, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 571
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Auglaize County, Ohio totaled $1,531,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Ed Davis | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $3,919 |
102 | Sycamore Spring Farm LLC | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $3,886 |
103 | Heintz Farms Enterprise | Belle Center, OH 43310 | $3,804 |
104 | Edwin L Spencer | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $3,762 |
105 | Jeffrey A Motter | Lima, OH 45806 | $3,630 |
106 | Lowry Operating LLC | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $3,616 |
107 | Thomas O Menchofer | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $3,604 |
108 | Richard Rinehart | Washoe Valley, NV 89704 | $3,578 |
109 | Southland Centennial Farm Inc | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $3,476 |
110 | Bowsher Farms LLC | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $3,470 |
111 | Clayton Seibert Family Revocable Trust | Spencerville, OH 45887 | $3,430 |
112 | Dale H Stiles | Cridersville, OH 45806 | $3,347 |
113 | Charles J Niemeyer | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $3,338 |
114 | Pusheta Creek Real Estate LLC | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $3,250 |
115 | Kurt T Warner | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $3,154 |
116 | Ned J Warner | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $3,154 |
117 | Ron G Cummins | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $3,104 |
118 | Ned Koenig | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $3,103 |
119 | Luanne M Shelby | Dublin, OH 43016 | $3,103 |
120 | Lynn Koenig | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $3,103 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”