Farm Subsidy information
Auglaize County, Ohio
Total Subsidies in Auglaize County, Ohio, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,086
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Auglaize County, Ohio totaled $16,239,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hager Farms LLC | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $85,987 |
22 | Richard Seibert | Spencerville, OH 45887 | $85,771 |
23 | David Harold Homan | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $84,455 |
24 | Howard Homan Farms Inc | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $81,661 |
25 | Lowell W Seibert | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $80,550 |
26 | Daniel A Homan Revocable Trust | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $79,780 |
27 | Kermit Lynn Hecht | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $79,407 |
28 | Kurt T Warner | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $76,981 |
29 | Ned J Warner | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $76,981 |
30 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $76,945 |
31 | Brett T Fledderjohann | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $76,881 |
32 | Southland Centennial Farm Inc | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $76,508 |
33 | Dennis Krites | Lima, OH 45806 | $75,811 |
34 | Scott T Kohler Revocable Trust | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $75,369 |
35 | Chris R Harrod | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $74,430 |
36 | Kevin E Fisher | Botkins, OH 45306 | $74,206 |
37 | Charles Sutherland | Waynesfield, OH 45896 | $72,520 |
38 | Robert T Poeppelman | Yorkshire, OH 45388 | $71,646 |
39 | David J Huelskamp | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $69,558 |
40 | Paul Irvin Kill | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $69,105 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”