Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Auglaize County, Ohio, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 111

Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Auglaize County, Ohio totaled $1,654,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE)
1995-2023
1W & J Farming PtrWapakoneta, OH 45895$87,644
2Heintz Farms EnterpriseBelle Center, OH 43310$86,668
3James H HolthausWapakoneta, OH 45895$73,214
4Southland Centennial Farm IncNew Bremen, OH 45869$64,389
5Robert T PoeppelmanYorkshire, OH 45388$63,147
6Lisa R HeitzWapakoneta, OH 45895$63,010
7R & J Bauer IncWapakoneta, OH 45895$58,538
8Daniel A Homan Revocable TrustNew Bremen, OH 45869$55,571
9Karl Louis DammeyerSaint Marys, OH 45885$51,109
10Kenneth AnkermanSaint Marys, OH 45885$45,329
11Chrisschroerrevtr- Chris M SchroerSaint Marys, OH 45885$39,726
12John AnkermanSaint Marys, OH 45885$37,366
13Kohler Acres IncWapakoneta, OH 45895$36,789
14Kucks Turkey FarmSaint Marys, OH 45885$36,320
15Gregory A KrugerHarrod, OH 45850$34,307
16Wwa FarmsSaint Marys, OH 45885$33,522
17Lane Hill Farm Limited PtrMinster, OH 45865$33,074
18Thomas L DoorleyWapakoneta, OH 45895$31,090
19James A BowersockSpencerville, OH 45887$29,913
20Becher Farms IncWapakoneta, OH 45895$28,121

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag