Total Conservation Programs in Auglaize County, Ohio, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 554
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Auglaize County, Ohio totaled $1,100,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jack T Leffel-jack T Leffel Revtr | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $9,963 |
22 | George E Niemeyer | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $9,771 |
23 | Harry Mcpheron | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $9,529 |
24 | Richard Presar | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $9,343 |
25 | Howard D Bair | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $9,139 |
26 | Tommy L Winegardner | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $8,356 |
27 | James A Lee Revocable Trust | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $8,248 |
28 | James Johns Keystone Inheritance Irrevocable Trust | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $8,211 |
29 | Dianne E Kirkendall | Waynesfield, OH 45896 | $8,177 |
30 | Place Family Farms LLC | Milwaukee, WI 53217 | $7,775 |
31 | John A Settlage | New Knoxville, OH 45871 | $7,421 |
32 | Lucille Wauben | Lima, OH 45806 | $7,316 |
33 | Holiday Hills Inc | Lima, OH 45806 | $7,245 |
34 | Settlage & Settlage Partnership | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $7,144 |
35 | Paul B Weaver | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $7,086 |
36 | Mary-mary Lou Brautigam Rev Trust | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $7,025 |
37 | Richard Seibert | Spencerville, OH 45887 | $6,874 |
38 | Linda L Turner | Waynesfield, OH 45896 | $6,678 |
39 | Chris Speckman | New Knoxville, OH 45871 | $6,568 |
40 | Ron Burris | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $6,470 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”