Total Commodity Programs in Auglaize County, Ohio, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 159
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Auglaize County, Ohio totaled $1,749,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | K & K Dairy Inc | Botkins, OH 45306 | $130,157 |
2 | Howard Homan Farms Inc | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $109,004 |
3 | Settlage & Settlage Partnership | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $108,809 |
4 | Lane Hill Farm LLC | Minster, OH 45865 | $104,166 |
5 | Jeremy W Elsass, Quietcove Farm Holstein | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $97,964 |
6 | Kevin E Fisher | Botkins, OH 45306 | $92,579 |
7 | Bornhorst Dairy Inc | Fort Loramie, OH 45845 | $79,757 |
8 | David Harold Homan | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $77,212 |
9 | Dahlinghaus Farms LLC | Minster, OH 45865 | $76,512 |
10 | Alan Brown | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $64,065 |
11 | Dan W Koenig | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $58,821 |
12 | Louis Brown | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $57,659 |
13 | Michael P Smith | New Knoxville, OH 45871 | $56,899 |
14 | Koeper Farms LLC | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $55,221 |
15 | A & M Farm, Inc. | Minster, OH 45865 | $53,955 |
16 | Richard L Steinke Mapl-valle Farms | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $53,563 |
17 | Jay Elshoff, Golden Hills Farm | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $49,237 |
18 | Donald J Klein, Klein Dairy | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $45,605 |
19 | David Osterloh Iv-ann Farms | Minster, OH 45865 | $44,247 |
20 | Nicholas D Homan | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $30,692 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>