Conservation Reserve Program in Butler County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 323
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Butler County, Ohio totaled $6,863,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Edward Joseph Stang | Oxford, OH 45056 | $19,868 |
122 | Jeffery D Schwab | Somerville, OH 45064 | $19,689 |
123 | Edward I Beeler | Hamilton, OH 45013 | $18,868 |
124 | Lee-ld Hieronymus Li D Hieronymus | Miamisburg, OH 45342 | $18,853 |
125 | Clifford Nick Schwab | Oxford, OH 45056 | $18,565 |
126 | Dwight R Harris Trust Dated Aug 9 1976 As Amended | Columbus, OH 43209 | $18,485 |
127 | Stanley K Henshaw | Pittsboro, NC 27312 | $18,440 |
128 | Adam C Simpson | Hamilton, OH 45013 | $17,988 |
129 | Deborah J Lacey | Hamilton, OH 45013 | $17,933 |
130 | George H Imhoff | Oxford, OH 45056 | $17,730 |
131 | Timothy Hugh Mullen Trust | Okeana, OH 45053 | $17,232 |
132 | Jason A Degroat | Germantown, OH 45327 | $17,189 |
133 | Laura B Gill | West Des Moines, IA 50266 | $17,128 |
134 | Edward C Ulreich | Hamilton, OH 45013 | $16,845 |
135 | Agnes Ziepfel | Hamilton, OH 45013 | $16,819 |
136 | Ed Dillhoff | Okeana, OH 45053 | $16,669 |
137 | Betty A Henshaw Trust | Cincinnati, OH 45202 | $16,330 |
138 | Michael Arnold Livin Arnold | Okeana, OH 45053 | $16,163 |
139 | Christopher A Jones | Hamilton, OH 45013 | $16,120 |
140 | Mark C Halsey | Trenton, OH 45067 | $16,057 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”