Production Flexibility Program in Champaign County, Ohio, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 996
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Champaign County, Ohio totaled $23,555,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | David Clapp Revocable Living Trus | Urbana, OH 43078 | $156,594 |
22 | Jack Graham | North Lewisburg, OH 43060 | $153,320 |
23 | Frances Laughman | Urbana, OH 43078 | $152,366 |
24 | Michael Russell | Urbana, OH 43078 | $149,267 |
25 | Rick Clyburn | Urbana, OH 43078 | $148,891 |
26 | Michael K Boerger | Mechanicsburg, OH 43044 | $139,909 |
27 | Wayne Hamilton | Urbana, OH 43078 | $135,761 |
28 | Donohoe Farms LLC | Woodstock, OH 43084 | $134,533 |
29 | Karen S Blazer | Woodstock, OH 43084 | $133,034 |
30 | William E Blazer | Woodstock, OH 43084 | $133,034 |
31 | Clifford Baughman | Saint Paris, OH 43072 | $132,730 |
32 | Matthew Yoder | West Liberty, OH 43357 | $128,979 |
33 | Gary J Dibert | De Graff, OH 43318 | $128,969 |
34 | Dale Circle | Saint Paris, OH 43072 | $128,215 |
35 | Bill E Black Sr | Mechanicsburg, OH 43044 | $127,953 |
36 | Tom Tullis | West Liberty, OH 43357 | $127,208 |
37 | Ed Funderburgh | Woodstock, OH 43084 | $127,119 |
38 | Olajeane Faulkner | Urbana, OH 43078 | $121,569 |
39 | Gerald L Phillips | North Lewisburg, OH 43060 | $119,285 |
40 | Richard A Prince | Conover, OH 45317 | $119,052 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”