Conservation Reserve Program in Clark County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 467
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Clark County, Ohio totaled $9,931,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Keith Hyslop | Springfield, OH 45502 | $55,643 |
42 | Larry E Miller Sr | South Solon, OH 43153 | $54,261 |
43 | George A Degenhart | Springfield, OH 45502 | $53,537 |
44 | Ira Rust | Springfield, OH 45502 | $51,084 |
45 | Lamar Spracklen | Xenia, OH 45385 | $50,954 |
46 | Hamer Spears Estate | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $50,664 |
47 | Bume Farms LLC | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $50,068 |
48 | Martin L Spears | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $49,747 |
49 | Marlene K Reid | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $49,677 |
50 | Reid Family Limited | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $49,641 |
51 | Ronald Harbage | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $49,306 |
52 | Robert A Agle | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $47,358 |
53 | Mary Patton Hunter Trust Dated 3/10/1977 | Marysville, OH 43040 | $46,824 |
54 | Robert Mcclure Jr | Springfield, OH 45502 | $46,301 |
55 | Robert W Mcclure III | Enon, OH 45323 | $46,300 |
56 | Peggy J Wenrick | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $46,287 |
57 | , | $45,530 | |
58 | Thomas J Garry | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $44,453 |
59 | Stanley Snyder Sr | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $43,682 |
60 | Daniel Lee Thompson | South Solon, OH 43153 | $43,604 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”