Direct Payment Program in Clark County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 960
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Clark County, Ohio totaled $28,995,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Philip Shaw | Springfield, OH 45502 | $189,279 |
42 | Theresa L Thompson | Springfield, OH 45502 | $187,678 |
43 | Eric Kesler | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $181,136 |
44 | Steve Mumma | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $179,742 |
45 | Doug Markley | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $179,617 |
46 | Richard Wildman Dba Avalon Farms | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $176,432 |
47 | John C Wilt | South Solon, OH 43153 | $173,210 |
48 | Woodlawn Farms Partnership | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $163,536 |
49 | Kevin C Legge | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $152,841 |
50 | Elcamere Farms M Penrose | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $151,430 |
51 | James A Clem | Springfield, OH 45506 | $144,043 |
52 | Prosser Bros | Springfield, OH 45502 | $141,418 |
53 | Tom Troxell | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $141,200 |
54 | Richard Allen Armstrong | Springfield, OH 45502 | $139,076 |
55 | Constance A Bishop | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $136,614 |
56 | Larry Timmons | Springfield, OH 45502 | $136,441 |
57 | Marvin Berschet | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $134,939 |
58 | Robert Bishop | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $134,754 |
59 | Martin L Spears | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $131,825 |
60 | Kevin P Welsheimer | Enon, OH 45323 | $131,461 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”