Conservation Reserve Program in Clark County, Ohio, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 150
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Clark County, Ohio totaled $237,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Kenneth Lokai | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $712 |
62 | Michael Bonham | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $697 |
63 | Ault G Wilson Farms LLC | Springfield, OH 45503 | $688 |
64 | Dale Maxson | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $661 |
65 | Mary Patton Hunter Trust Dated 3/10/1977 | Marysville, OH 43040 | $654 |
66 | Jeffrey Earl Troxell | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $648 |
67 | Daniel Lee Thompson | South Solon, OH 43153 | $639 |
68 | Hope A Palmer | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $629 |
69 | Peggy L Panknin | Westerville, OH 43082 | $629 |
70 | Phil Metzger | Springfield, OH 45504 | $526 |
71 | The Myers Family Revocable Living Trust - Carla E | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $515 |
72 | Spring Run Farms Inc | Fairborn, OH 45324 | $506 |
73 | Robert Spracklen | South Solon, OH 43153 | $485 |
74 | Roger Brigner | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $483 |
75 | Robert Andrew Bumgardner | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $477 |
76 | Michael R Mcfarland | Springfield, OH 45502 | $476 |
77 | Frances D Battin | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $454 |
78 | Brent Neer | Mechanicsburg, OH 43044 | $440 |
79 | Scott Cheney | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $439 |
80 | J & J Farms Inc | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $432 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”