Conservation Reserve Program in Clark County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 467
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Clark County, Ohio totaled $9,931,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Roger Peterson | Springfield, OH 45504 | $37,422 |
82 | Spring Run Farms Inc | Fairborn, OH 45324 | $37,394 |
83 | Drj Farms | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $37,361 |
84 | Barbara Mcnally | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $37,259 |
85 | Nancy Dickerson | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $36,869 |
86 | William Mattinson | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $36,768 |
87 | Kevin Mattinson | South Solon, OH 43153 | $36,728 |
88 | Mark A Shuman | Springfield, OH 45502 | $36,710 |
89 | John Evans Dba Evans Farm | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $36,024 |
90 | Gary Durst | Springfield, OH 45505 | $35,823 |
91 | Beckley Farms LLC | Frankfort, OH 45628 | $35,502 |
92 | Je & Fm Parker Trust | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $35,255 |
93 | Nancy Fisher | Springfield, OH 45502 | $35,095 |
94 | Shuman Farms Inc | Springfield, OH 45502 | $34,717 |
95 | James Locke | Mechanicsburg, OH 43044 | $34,214 |
96 | Bumme Farms LLC | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $34,124 |
97 | Michael Bonham | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $33,866 |
98 | Oakview Farm-limited Partnership | Yellow Springs, OH 45387 | $32,882 |
99 | Samuel A Bowman III | Jeffersonville, OH 43128 | $32,644 |
100 | Phil Metzger | Springfield, OH 45504 | $31,321 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”