Conservation Reserve Program in Clark County, Ohio, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 162
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Clark County, Ohio totaled $492,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Phil Metzger | Springfield, OH 45504 | $526 |
82 | Spring Run Farms Inc | Fairborn, OH 45324 | $506 |
83 | Larry Samuel Mullins | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $502 |
84 | Robert Spracklen | South Solon, OH 43153 | $485 |
85 | Roger Brigner | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $483 |
86 | Robert Andrew Bumgardner | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $477 |
87 | Michael R Mcfarland | Springfield, OH 45502 | $476 |
88 | Frances D Battin | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $454 |
89 | Wm J Brock | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $448 |
90 | Brent Neer | Mechanicsburg, OH 43044 | $440 |
91 | Scott Cheney | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $439 |
92 | Alan And Theresa Thompson Farm | Springfield, OH 45502 | $430 |
93 | Lloyd M Alexander Iv | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $419 |
94 | Karen Hupp | Springfield, OH 45502 | $400 |
95 | Deborah A Shuman | Springfield, OH 45502 | $392 |
96 | Indrini Farm LLC | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $384 |
97 | Robert L Skillings | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $379 |
98 | Agle Family Cattle Inc. | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $375 |
99 | Philip Shaw | Springfield, OH 45502 | $374 |
100 | Martin L Spears | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $370 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”