Conservation Reserve Program in Clark County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 467
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Clark County, Ohio totaled $9,931,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Kevin D Spears | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $19,366 |
162 | Marian Mccall | Galloway, OH 43119 | $19,329 |
163 | Christine Metzger | Springfield, OH 45502 | $19,308 |
164 | Anders G Bauer | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $19,299 |
165 | William G Hancock Estate | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $19,162 |
166 | J Scott Gray | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $18,788 |
167 | Emmert L Funderburg | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $18,753 |
168 | Kenneth Hopper | Springfield, OH 45502 | $18,742 |
169 | Marvin Berschet | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $18,712 |
170 | Matt Rue | Springfield, OH 45502 | $18,702 |
171 | James O Augustus | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $18,593 |
172 | Mark Cessna | Springfield, OH 45502 | $18,259 |
173 | W Roger Thompson Trust | Springfield, OH 45502 | $18,166 |
174 | Melvin Shoup | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $18,139 |
175 | Ruth Y Young | Springfield, OH 45502 | $17,658 |
176 | Jeff Harvey | Springfield, OH 45502 | $17,427 |
177 | Adam Agle & Sons LLC | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $16,868 |
178 | Jereme A Best | Springfield, OH 45502 | $16,679 |
179 | R Alan Thompson | Springfield, OH 45502 | $16,067 |
180 | Martha Maxson | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $16,054 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”