Loan Deficiency in Clark County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 782
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Clark County, Ohio totaled $22,477,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Beaverdale Farms Inc | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $189,615 |
22 | Brent A Pence | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $188,306 |
23 | Stewart Farms | Springfield, OH 45502 | $187,788 |
24 | Robert Bishop | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $187,578 |
25 | Elcamere Farms M Penrose | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $184,405 |
26 | Kenneth Lokai | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $182,040 |
27 | Robert Keehner Jr | London, OH 43140 | $181,414 |
28 | Brock Brothers Farm | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $178,103 |
29 | Roger Neff | Springfield, OH 45502 | $176,174 |
30 | Mcdorman Farms Inc | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $176,075 |
31 | Roger Thompson Farms Inc | Springfield, OH 45502 | $174,478 |
32 | Kelley Kimley | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $170,680 |
33 | James A Clem | Springfield, OH 45506 | $165,363 |
34 | William Mattinson | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $162,561 |
35 | Larry Barclay | Springfield, OH 45502 | $159,957 |
36 | Ryan Barclay | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $159,607 |
37 | Rodney Barclay | Yellow Springs, OH 45387 | $159,604 |
38 | John T Baird & David J Baird Ptr Dba Jersey Manor | Springfield, OH 45502 | $157,627 |
39 | Philip L Steele | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $153,600 |
40 | L And R Clark Farms | Springfield, OH 45504 | $151,614 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”