Total Conservation Programs in Clark County, Ohio, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 162
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Clark County, Ohio totaled $492,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lynn- Alan Farms | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $77,252 |
2 | Marlene K Reid | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $49,033 |
3 | Reid Family Limited | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $48,997 |
4 | William Mattinson | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $36,407 |
5 | Kevin Mattinson | South Solon, OH 43153 | $36,367 |
6 | Little Miami Conservancy | Loveland, OH 45140 | $21,800 |
7 | J & J Farms Inc | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $21,322 |
8 | Melvin Shoup | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $17,890 |
9 | Philip L Steele | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $12,855 |
10 | David L Allen | Springfield, OH 45502 | $10,368 |
11 | Nancy Fisher | Springfield, OH 45502 | $7,019 |
12 | Ray Steele | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $6,236 |
13 | Adam E Steele | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $6,236 |
14 | Bart F Neer | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $5,771 |
15 | Larry R Wolbert | Mechanicsburg, OH 43044 | $5,250 |
16 | Mike Taylor | Springfield, OH 45502 | $5,179 |
17 | Robert A Agle | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $5,162 |
18 | Bumme Farms LLC | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $4,762 |
19 | , | $4,295 | |
20 | B & C Miller Farm Inc | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $3,982 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>